This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 183772 - [69cat] Diff sidebar doesn't respect code folding
Summary: [69cat] Diff sidebar doesn't respect code folding
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: utilities
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Diff (show other bugs)
Version: 6.x
Hardware: PC Linux
: P2 normal (vote)
Assignee: Ondrej Vrabec
URL:
Keywords:
: 185538 186079 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2010-04-09 13:48 UTC by Michel Graciano
Modified: 2010-05-13 11:23 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
Sample image (26.62 KB, image/png)
2010-04-09 13:49 UTC, Michel Graciano 		Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Michel Graciano 2010-04-09 13:48:22 UTC 
[ BUILD # : ef67b41cc450 ]
[ JDK VERSION : 1.6.* ]

If I fold imports my diff sidebar is painted in incorrect lines. I will attach
an image as example, but basically the sidebar keep the editor position before
code fold run and this position is not updated after editor fold.
Comment 1 Michel Graciano 2010-04-09 13:49:47 UTC 
Created attachment 96961 [details]
Sample image

Well, I forgot to say that just the paint is problematic, the mouse click to see the diff is working correctly.
Comment 2 Ondrej Vrabec 2010-04-12 09:11:18 UTC 
fix: http://hg.netbeans.org/cdev/rev/a9e2825e8ba8
Comment 3 Quality Engineering 2010-04-13 17:34:17 UTC 
Integrated into 'main-golden', will be available in build *201004131450* on http://bits.netbeans.org/dev/nightly/ (upload may still be in progress)
Changeset: http://hg.netbeans.org/main/rev/a9e2825e8ba8
User: Ondrej Vrabec <ovrabec@netbeans.org>
Log: Issue #183772 - [69cat] Diff sidebar doesn't respect code folding
Comment 4 Ondrej Vrabec 2010-05-11 14:01:18 UTC 
*** Bug 185538 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Ondrej Vrabec 2010-05-13 11:23:56 UTC 
*** Bug 186079 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***