This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 182368 - NullPointerException at org.netbeans.modules.javafx.refactoring.impl.scanners.MoveProblemCollector.checkVisibilty
Summary: NullPointerException at org.netbeans.modules.javafx.refactoring.impl.scanners...
Status: VERIFIED DUPLICATE of bug 182365
Alias: None
Product: javafx
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Unsupported (show other bugs)
Version: 6.x
Hardware: All All
: P3 normal (vote)
Assignee: J Bachorik
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2010-03-19 12:11 UTC by Exceptions Reporter
Modified: 2010-03-23 13:30 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter: 166687

Attachments
stacktrace (5.27 KB, text/plain)
2010-03-19 12:12 UTC, Exceptions Reporter 		Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Exceptions Reporter 2010-03-19 12:11:54 UTC 
Build: NetBeans IDE Dev (Build 201003180200)
VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM, 14.1-b02, Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment, 1.6.0_15-b03
OS: Windows XP

Stacktrace: 
java.lang.NullPointerException
   at org.netbeans.modules.javafx.refactoring.impl.scanners.MoveProblemCollector.checkVisibilty(MoveProblemCollector.java:224)
   at org.netbeans.modules.javafx.refactoring.impl.scanners.MoveProblemCollector.visitMemberSelect(MoveProblemCollector.java:175)
   at com.sun.tools.javafx.tree.JFXSelect.accept(JFXSelect.java:68)
   at com.sun.javafx.api.tree.JavaFXTreePathScanner.scan(JavaFXTreePathScanner.java:63)
   at com.sun.javafx.api.tree.JavaFXTreeScanner.visitAssignment(JavaFXTreeScanner.java:188)
   at com.sun.tools.javafx.tree.JFXAssign.accept(JFXAssign.java:62)
Comment 1 Exceptions Reporter 2010-03-19 12:12:01 UTC 
Created attachment 95426 [details]
stacktrace
Comment 2 J Bachorik 2010-03-19 13:54:25 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 182360 ***
Comment 3 J Bachorik 2010-03-19 13:55:33 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 182365 ***
Comment 4 Alexandr Scherbatiy 2010-03-23 13:30:19 UTC 
verified as duplicate