This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 182179 - [69cat] Test Results window "Go To Source" works inconsistently for failed tests
Summary: [69cat] Test Results window "Go To Source" works inconsistently for failed tests
Status: RESOLVED INCOMPLETE
Alias: None
Product: ruby
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Testing (show other bugs)
Version: 6.x
Hardware: All All
: P3 normal (vote)
Assignee: Erno Mononen
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2010-03-17 08:18 UTC by esmithbss
Modified: 2010-05-06 11:33 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:


Attachments
Log File of run with bad GoToSource calling. (292.91 KB, application/octet-stream)
2010-03-17 14:18 UTC, esmithbss
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description esmithbss 2010-03-17 08:18:06 UTC
Product Version = NetBeans IDE Dev (Build 201003160201)
Operating System = Linux version 2.6.32-trunk-686 running on i386
Java; VM; Vendor = 1.6.0_18
Runtime = Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM 16.0-b13

In the Test Results window, the "Go To Source" pop-up menu item works for failed methods within a failed test, but not for the failed test itself.
Comment 1 Erno Mononen 2010-03-17 08:48:50 UTC
Can you please attach the log file with detailed logging turned on? Looks like either a bug in parsing the test output or for some reason test/unit doesn't provide the info needed for finding out the location.
Comment 2 esmithbss 2010-03-17 14:18:52 UTC
Created attachment 95300 [details]
Log File of run  with bad GoToSource calling.
Comment 3 Erno Mononen 2010-03-18 13:40:10 UTC
Can you please turn on detailed logging in Tools | Options | Ruby before the run? The test runner related logging uses FINE/FINER for logging so by default w/o detailed logging turned on nothing gets logged.
Comment 4 Erno Mononen 2010-05-06 11:33:33 UTC
Marking as incomplete for now, please see the previous comment (please reopen when you have the chance to test this again).