This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 177190 - JavaFX plugins are not available on UC for Dev builds
Summary: JavaFX plugins are not available on UC for Dev builds
Status: CLOSED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: javafx
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Unsupported (show other bugs)
Version: 6.x
Hardware: All All
: P2 normal (vote)
Assignee: Adam Sotona
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-11-19 05:28 UTC by Marian Mirilovic
Modified: 2009-12-03 03:26 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Marian Mirilovic 2009-11-19 05:28:21 UTC

    
Comment 2 rnovak 2009-11-19 06:20:12 UTC
Build nbms-and-javadoc is administrated by development. Jesse, can you comment on this issue ?
Comment 3 Jiri Kovalsky 2009-11-19 06:26:58 UTC
Robert asked Jesse, not me. :-)
Comment 4 Jesse Glick 2009-11-20 10:22:47 UTC
The JavaFX repository has never been built by nbms-and-javadoc. I suppose it could be but I don't really understand its build setup and I am wary of making nbms-and-javadoc more prone to failure. Probably it would be better for the JavaFX team to set up their own continuous build somewhere public (if they have not done so already) and add a link to the list of UCs in the IDE.
Comment 5 Lukas Hasik 2009-11-20 12:59:36 UTC
imo, this one should be assigned to RE. They know where to take the nbms from. I They are built internally. The only needed thing is to upload those nbms to UC with all the other nbms from nb build
Comment 6 Adam Sotona 2009-11-23 03:20:44 UTC
JavaFX Plugins were never supposed to be available on "dev" update center (at least what I know). 
During development we are mostly using not-yet-released version of JavaFX SDK so we could not publish the plugins.

With 6.8 release we stay with already released JavaFX SDK 1.2.1 so it is theoretically possible, but right after 6.8 release (which is coming soon) we need to disappear from dev UC again.
Comment 7 Marian Mirilovic 2009-12-03 03:26:05 UTC
v/c