This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 172979 - [68cat] AWT thread blocked for 5432 ms.
Summary: [68cat] AWT thread blocked for 5432 ms.
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 171410
Alias: None
Product: versioncontrol
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Code (show other bugs)
Version: 6.x
Hardware: All All
: P3 blocker (vote)
Assignee: issues@versioncontrol
URL: http://statistics.netbeans.org/except...
Keywords: PERFORMANCE
: 173547 174591 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-09-24 10:33 UTC by rmartins
Modified: 2009-12-08 01:09 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter: 157698


Attachments
nps snapshot (15.81 KB, bin/nps)
2009-09-24 10:33 UTC, rmartins
Details
nps snapshot (15.85 KB, bin/nps)
2009-09-24 10:53 UTC, rmartins
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description rmartins 2009-09-24 10:33:52 UTC
Build: NetBeans IDE Dev (Build cnd-main-1751-on-090923)
VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM, 14.0-b16, Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment, 1.6.0_14-b08
OS: Linux, 2.6.28-15-generic, i386

User Comments:
GUEST: expanded the project navigation window and it took time to open.

areeda: On loading with a php project


Maximum slowness yet reported was 6219 ms, average is 4767
Comment 1 rmartins 2009-09-24 10:33:56 UTC
Created attachment 88265 [details]
nps snapshot
Comment 2 Exceptions Reporter 2009-09-24 10:34:01 UTC
This issue already has 6 duplicates 
see http://statistics.netbeans.org/exceptions/detail.do?id=157698
Comment 3 rmartins 2009-09-24 10:53:55 UTC
Build: NetBeans IDE Dev (Build cnd-main-1751-on-090923)
VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM, 14.0-b16, Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment, 1.6.0_14-b08
OS: Linux, 2.6.28-15-generic, i386

User Comments: 

Maximum slowness yet reported was 10919 ms, average is 5646
Comment 4 rmartins 2009-09-24 10:53:59 UTC
Created attachment 88266 [details]
nps snapshot
Comment 5 Exceptions Reporter 2009-09-24 10:54:04 UTC
This issue already has 7 duplicates 
see http://statistics.netbeans.org/exceptions/detail.do?id=157698
Comment 6 Exceptions Reporter 2009-09-25 07:37:59 UTC
This issue already has 8 duplicates 
see http://statistics.netbeans.org/exceptions/detail.do?id=157698
Comment 7 t_h 2009-09-29 09:32:40 UTC
VersioningAnnotationProvider.annotateNameHtml() takes too much time. Probably it should return immediately and fire
change later.
Comment 8 Exceptions Reporter 2009-09-29 12:55:51 UTC
This issue already has 9 duplicates 
see http://statistics.netbeans.org/exceptions/detail.do?id=157698
Comment 9 Exceptions Reporter 2009-09-29 14:54:46 UTC
This issue already has 10 duplicates 
see http://statistics.netbeans.org/exceptions/detail.do?id=157698
Comment 10 Exceptions Reporter 2009-10-01 15:14:54 UTC
This issue already has 12 duplicates 
see http://statistics.netbeans.org/exceptions/detail.do?id=157698
Comment 11 Exceptions Reporter 2009-10-05 10:04:03 UTC
This issue already has 13 duplicates 
see http://statistics.netbeans.org/exceptions/detail.do?id=157698
Comment 12 t_h 2009-10-05 12:20:15 UTC
*** Issue 173547 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 13 giorgio42 2009-10-14 08:25:36 UTC
There are now 21 duplicates in the exception reports (don't know why this is not reflected in the issue here).

Why is the target milestone TBD (shouldn't this be 6.8) ?
How many duplicates are needed before the priority will be increased automatically ?

Comment 14 Ondrej Vrabec 2009-10-14 09:10:46 UTC
giorgio42:
> There are now 21 duplicates in the exception reports
Yes, but i detected at least 4 of them reported by you - a single user - so the exception reporter should count them as
one and should not increase the priority

> How many duplicates are needed before the priority will be increased automatically
25, i think, but unless i am mistaken, they all should be reported by different users - which in case of this issue they
clearly are not.

> Why is the target milestone TBD (shouldn't this be 6.8)
i'm changing TM to next, this will not be fixed in 6.8, since it would require major changes, probably a change in the
API of versioning systems and there are still some unresolved problems regarding the fix, which need to be discussed
across several netbeans modules - versioning, core, nodes, editor, etc. There's simply not enough time till 6.8 release.
You must understand that integrating the fix may cause 6.8 unstable and may cause more problems than it would resolve.

If you use daily builds (from the reports i suspect that you do), you will get the fix soon after 6.8 is branched. You
would probably get faster response from IDE if you disable versioning labels - View > Show Versioning Labels.

BTW, we already have an issue with a higher priority filed for this - see issue 171410
Comment 15 giorgio42 2009-10-14 21:13:16 UTC
Why should n exceptions that occurred to one user count only as 1 exception ? If there is a bug in NB causing an endless 
loop of exceptions rendering NB unuseable NB engineering would not even notice.

I totally depend on versioning labels (one of the reasons to do versioning is to be easily able to find out what version 
a file has and to have this information available in a human readable format - which is the sucking aspect about systems 
like SVN, Mercurial and GIT).

But I accept that there is not enough bandwidth to fix this issue in a diligent way for the NB 6.8 release.

Comment 16 t_h 2009-10-15 14:14:27 UTC
*** Issue 174591 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 17 Ondrej Vrabec 2009-12-08 01:09:48 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 171410 ***