This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 170974 - 47s in GsfCodeTemplateManagerOperation.getTemplateFilters()
Summary: 47s in GsfCodeTemplateManagerOperation.getTemplateFilters()
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 172363
Alias: None
Product: ruby
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Project (show other bugs)
Version: 6.x
Hardware: All All
: P3 blocker (vote)
Assignee: Erno Mononen
URL: http://statistics.netbeans.org/except...
Keywords: PERFORMANCE
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-08-27 09:46 UTC by Exceptions Reporter
Modified: 2009-10-01 09:31 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter: 157041

Attachments
nps snapshot (31.90 KB, bin/nps)
2009-08-27 09:46 UTC, Exceptions Reporter 		Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Exceptions Reporter 2009-08-27 09:46:41 UTC 
Build: NetBeans IDE Dev (Build 200908022240)
VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM, 14.0-b16, Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment, 1.6.0_14-b08
OS: Linux, 2.6.28-15-generic, i386

User Comments:
GUEST: Loading application_controller.rb file from Rails project


Maximum slowness yet reported was 47609 ms, average is 47609
Comment 1 Exceptions Reporter 2009-08-27 09:46:46 UTC 
Created attachment 86723 [details]
nps snapshot
Comment 2 Jaroslav Tulach 2009-08-27 14:31:38 UTC 
this is old snapshot, it contains just thread execution time, so the AWT is said to run just 60ms. But imho it is 
blocked in runWhenScanFinished for those 47s. After that it executes quickly.

The system shall not block in AWT and wait for scan finished, imho. Either bug in CSL or sooner in AbbrevDetection 
action.
Comment 3 Vitezslav Stejskal 2009-08-28 12:45:23 UTC 
Most of the time was spent in o.n.m.ruby.spi.project.support.rake.SourcesHelper$SourcesImpl.getSourceGroups().
Comment 4 Erno Mononen 2009-10-01 09:31:46 UTC 
Seems like a dupe of 172363 to me.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 172363 ***