This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 170131 - Editor is slow with mobile development
Summary: Editor is slow with mobile development
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 166843
Alias: None
Product: javame
Classification: Unclassified
Component: -- Other -- (show other bugs)
Version: 6.x
Hardware: All Windows XP
: P2 blocker (vote)
Assignee: issues@mobility
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-08-10 12:42 UTC by vnhjdh
Modified: 2009-09-18 11:39 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description vnhjdh 2009-08-10 12:42:24 UTC 
Editor is slow with mobile development. Getting worse and worse. Both 6.7 and 6.7.1.
Comment 1 Jiri Prox 2009-08-11 10:21:06 UTC 
Sorry, but can you be more specific? what exactly is slow? Can you capture some thread dumps or heap dumps in the
moments when the IDE is not responding. What type of project do you use and how big is your project?

I'm afraid that we cannot do anything with general repost as this one. 
Thanks for understanding.
Comment 2 vnhjdh 2009-08-11 12:05:13 UTC 
I have about 10 projects opened, but the editor (cursor freeze shortly) is only slow when I'm editing mobile files.

My mobile peoject is not that big (200 KB obf.), but it does include preprocessing variables.
Comment 3 vallej 2009-09-01 20:07:58 UTC 
The cause is here: http://www.netbeans.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=166843
Comment 4 vallej 2009-09-01 20:10:41 UTC 
The cause is here: http://www.netbeans.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=166843

Please, fix it ASAP, coz developing for mobile is impossible whith THAT preprocessing. Staying at NB 6.5...
Comment 5 vnhjdh 2009-09-18 11:39:24 UTC 
Impossible to work with NB when doing a mobile project!!!!
Comment 6 Andrei Chistiakov 2009-09-18 11:39:27 UTC 

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 166843 ***