This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 166511 - NullPointerException at com.sun.java.swing.plaf.windows.WindowsTreeUI.ensureRowsAreVisible
Summary: NullPointerException at com.sun.java.swing.plaf.windows.WindowsTreeUI.ensureR...
Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: platform
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Explorer (show other bugs)
Version: 6.x
Hardware: All All
: P4 blocker (vote)
Assignee: Jaroslav Tulach
URL: http://statistics.netbeans.org/except...
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-06-03 20:55 UTC by mcarney
Modified: 2010-04-02 07:02 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter: 151987

Attachments
stacktrace (2.41 KB, text/plain)
2009-06-03 20:55 UTC, mcarney 		Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description mcarney 2009-06-03 20:55:20 UTC 
Build: NetBeans IDE 6.5.1 (Build 200903060201)
VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM, 11.3-b02, Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment, 1.6.0_13-b03
OS: Windows XP, 5.1, x86

User Comments:
GUEST: Opening the project tree



Stacktrace: 
java.lang.NullPointerException
        at com.sun.java.swing.plaf.windows.WindowsTreeUI.ensureRowsAreVisible(WindowsTreeUI.java:74)
        at javax.swing.plaf.basic.BasicTreeUI.toggleExpandState(BasicTreeUI.java:2213)
        at javax.swing.plaf.basic.BasicTreeUI.handleExpandControlClick(BasicTreeUI.java:2196)
        at javax.swing.plaf.basic.BasicTreeUI.checkForClickInExpandControl(BasicTreeUI.java:2154)
        at javax.swing.plaf.basic.BasicTreeUI$Handler.handleSelection(BasicTreeUI.java:3516)
        at javax.swing.plaf.basic.BasicTreeUI$Handler.mousePressedDND(BasicTreeUI.java:3502)
Comment 1 mcarney 2009-06-03 20:55:28 UTC 
Created attachment 83177 [details]
stacktrace
Comment 2 Marian Mirilovic 2009-06-05 23:07:32 UTC 

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 140423 ***
Comment 3 Antonin Nebuzelsky 2009-06-10 13:00:51 UTC 
Not a duplicate. Reopening.
Comment 4 Jaroslav Tulach 2010-04-02 07:02:31 UTC 
No reports since 091204 - works for me.