This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 164391 - AssertionError: visnodes.size()=1 snapshot.size()=0
Summary: AssertionError: visnodes.size()=1 snapshot.size()=0
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 158328
Alias: None
Product: platform
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Explorer (show other bugs)
Version: 6.x
Hardware: All All
: P3 blocker (vote)
Assignee: t_h
URL: http://statistics.netbeans.org/except...
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-05-04 15:18 UTC by douglasv
Modified: 2009-05-05 16:15 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter: 150563


Attachments
stacktrace (4.03 KB, text/plain)
2009-05-04 15:18 UTC, douglasv
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description douglasv 2009-05-04 15:18:39 UTC
This issue was originally marked as duplicate of issue 148168, that is already fixed. This issue is still valid, so this seems to be another issue, but it might be related.

Build: NetBeans IDE 6.7 Beta (Build 200904280001)
VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM, 11.2-b01, Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment, 1.6.0_12-b04
OS: Windows Vista, 6.0, x86

User Comments:
douglasv: typing <div>

GUEST: clicked into an html.erb window/file



Stacktrace: 
java.lang.AssertionError: visnodes.size()=1 snapshot.size()=0
        at org.openide.explorer.view.VisualizerChildren.recomputeIndexes(VisualizerChildren.java:87)
        at org.openide.explorer.view.VisualizerChildren.getIndex(VisualizerChildren.java:153)
        at org.openide.explorer.view.VisualizerNode.getIndex(VisualizerNode.java:289)
        at javax.swing.tree.DefaultTreeModel.getIndexOfChild(DefaultTreeModel.java:142)
        at javax.swing.tree.FixedHeightLayoutCache.getBounds(FixedHeightLayoutCache.java:176)
        at javax.swing.plaf.basic.BasicTreeUI.getPathBounds(BasicTreeUI.java:515)
Comment 1 douglasv 2009-05-04 15:18:51 UTC
Created attachment 81472 [details]
stacktrace
Comment 2 t_h 2009-05-05 16:15:08 UTC

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 158328 ***