This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 151081 - pathname is used on python package for project created from existing sources
Summary: pathname is used on python package for project created from existing sources
Status: CLOSED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: python
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Projects (show other bugs)
Version: 6.x
Hardware: All All
: P3 blocker (vote)
Assignee: ardavis26
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-10-23 01:02 UTC by Peter Lam
Modified: 2017-06-23 08:06 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:


Attachments
python package displayed with pathname (38.25 KB, image/png)
2008-10-23 01:03 UTC, Peter Lam
Details
python package displayed with correct tooltip (26.65 KB, image/png)
2008-10-23 01:07 UTC, Peter Lam
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Peter Lam 2008-10-23 01:02:29 UTC
build 83 (20081022)

When the python project is created from a folder containing existing python sources, the python package is displayed
with the complete pathname to the system folder instead of just the name of the folder. See attached screenshot. The
tooltip does show just the folder name as the python package name.
Comment 1 Peter Lam 2008-10-23 01:03:37 UTC
Created attachment 72501 [details]
python package displayed with pathname
Comment 2 Peter Lam 2008-10-23 01:07:10 UTC
actually it's inconsistent on the tooltip. not sure when it shows the pathname and when it shows the package name.
Attached is a screenshot where the tooltip shows the package name. The previous screenshot shows the pathname.
Comment 3 Peter Lam 2008-10-23 01:07:48 UTC
Created attachment 72502 [details]
python package displayed with correct tooltip
Comment 4 Jenselme 2017-06-22 20:33:31 UTC
Not sure it is still relevant with the current version. Closing this as old bug. If this is still a thing, please reopen and accept my apologies.
Comment 5 Jiri Kovalsky 2017-06-23 08:06:19 UTC
Thanks for your evaluation Julien. Reporter, if you think your issue is still valid and needs to be addressed, don't hesitate to reopen it with additional information. Closing for now.