This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 14931 - Bean add function not reading jar manifest file correctly ??
Summary: Bean add function not reading jar manifest file correctly ??
Status: VERIFIED DUPLICATE of bug 8660
Alias: None
Product: guibuilder
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Code (show other bugs)
Version: 3.x
Hardware: PC Windows 95/98
: P2 blocker (vote)
Assignee: issues@guibuilder
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2001-08-29 19:58 UTC by Jeffrey Clark
Modified: 2003-08-20 15:14 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jeffrey Clark 2001-08-29 19:58:52 UTC
Encountering a problem when trying to add a user defined bean. The system says 
that it must be identified as a java bean 'Java-Bean: True'. I have created two 
separate beans; in two separate jars. Both can be inported into BDK1.1, yet I'm 
only able to add one into the NETBEANS IDE. Both of these have the same 
structure:

Manifest file contents:

This one works fine.

Name: ChangeCast.CustomPanel.class
Java-Bean: True

This one doesn't work.
 
Name: ChangeCast.Oval.class
Java-Bean: True
Comment 1 mboyer 2001-09-10 15:27:08 UTC
Changing component to VCSCVS.  (I'm hoping that's right)
Comment 2 Milos Kleint 2002-01-14 16:37:15 UTC
I don't believe so, moving to jarpackager..
Comment 3 brinkley 2002-01-15 12:26:45 UTC
Certianly isn't a jarpackager issue. I think this is a beans module
issue. Also I've been told that this is acutally due to the BDK not
implementing the bean specification correctly.
Comment 4 Tomas Hurka 2002-01-16 09:52:57 UTC
User defined beans are handled by form editor.
Comment 5 Tomas Pavek 2002-01-16 10:54:55 UTC
Jeffrey, your bug report has just arrived to the right module after 
several months traveling in Issuezilla. Congratulations ;-)

I think this is the same problem as reported already for several 
times. See issue 16365 for a description. Feel free to reopen if this 
is not the case.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 8660 ***
Comment 6 Jaromir Uhrik 2003-08-20 15:14:23 UTC
Verified - Duplicate.