This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 148536 - [65cat] AssertionError: java.beans.PropertyVetoException:
Summary: [65cat] AssertionError: java.beans.PropertyVetoException:
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 146284
Alias: None
Product: platform
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Explorer (show other bugs)
Version: 6.x
Hardware: All All
: P3 blocker (vote)
Assignee: t_h
URL: http://statistics.netbeans.org/except...
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-09-27 01:55 UTC by Michel Graciano
Modified: 2008-12-22 13:43 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter: 118989


Attachments
stacktrace (8.61 KB, text/plain)
2008-09-27 01:55 UTC, Michel Graciano
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Michel Graciano 2008-09-27 01:55:27 UTC
Build: NetBeans IDE Dev (Build 200809250201)
VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM, 10.0-b23, Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment, 1.6.0_07-b06
OS: Linux, 2.6.24-21-generic, i386

User Comments:
hmichel: Opening navigator deom ant script file

hmichel: Opening navigator deom ant script file



Stacktrace: 
java.lang.AssertionError: java.beans.PropertyVetoException: 
        at org.apache.tools.ant.module.nodes.AntNavigatorPanel$1Panel$1.run(AntNavigatorPanel.java:124)
        at org.openide.util.Mutex.postRequest(Mutex.java:1251)
        at org.openide.util.Mutex.postReadRequest(Mutex.java:565)
        at org.apache.tools.ant.module.nodes.AntNavigatorPanel$1Panel.requestFocusInWindow(AntNavigatorPanel.java:116)
        at org.netbeans.modules.navigator.NavigatorTC.requestFocusInWindow(NavigatorTC.java:250)
        at org.netbeans.core.windows.view.ui.AbstractModeContainer.focusSelectedTopComponent(AbstractModeContainer.java:166)
Comment 1 Michel Graciano 2008-09-27 01:55:33 UTC
Created attachment 70712 [details]
stacktrace
Comment 2 t_h 2008-09-27 08:18:34 UTC

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 146284 ***