When utilizing code-completion of Javadoc, the type of the field displayed does not match the actual type of the field
if a field of the same name (and different type) exists in a superclass.

public class TestParent {
    public static final String TEST = null;
}

/**
 * {@link #| (* code completion invoked *)
+----------------------------------------+
| # TEST                          String |
+----------------------------------------+
 */
public class TestChild extends TestParent {
    public static final Object[] TEST = null;
}

Note that the type is listed as String (the type of a similarly-named static field in the superclass) when it is really
of type Object[].  This may also be the case for type resolution of non-static fields.