This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 134749 - Database Explorer much slower when getting list of tables
Summary: Database Explorer much slower when getting list of tables
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 135007
Alias: None
Product: db
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Code (show other bugs)
Version: 6.x
Hardware: All Windows Vista
: P3 blocker (vote)
Assignee: David Vancouvering
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-05-08 22:01 UTC by bolsover
Modified: 2008-08-19 01:13 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description bolsover 2008-05-08 22:01:02 UTC
There appears to have been a significant change in the way database explorer lists tables in 6.1 release;, tables are 
now listed Z -> A whereas in 6.1beata these were listed A->Z. There also seems to be a significant reduction in 
performance between 6.1 beta and 6.1 final. Listing a large number of tables appears to take very much longer. I am 
working with an Oracle 8 database containing some 2600 tables, 2500 views and 57,000 procedures. - I have never 
actually been able to list the procedures with any version of netbeans - but hardly suprising given the very large 
number!
Comment 1 David Vancouvering 2008-05-14 01:00:21 UTC
By George, you're right, they're listed in the wrong order!  I changed the way sorting was done, and I think I know the
problem.  I'm going to log that as a separate issue as I think it's unrelated to the performance issue.

In terms of performance issues, however, I don't know what's causing that.  We'll need to investigate further.
Comment 2 David Vancouvering 2008-08-19 01:12:52 UTC

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 135007 ***
Comment 3 David Vancouvering 2008-08-19 01:13:45 UTC
Can you please open a separate issue on the performance problem?  Thanks.