This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 130103 - Assertion failure opening freeform project...
Summary: Assertion failure opening freeform project...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 122246
Alias: None
Product: java
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Compiler (show other bugs)
Version: 6.x
Hardware: Sun All
: P3 blocker (vote)
Assignee: Dusan Balek
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-03-13 23:26 UTC by _ pcw
Modified: 2008-03-14 10:38 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:


Attachments
Assertion Failure... (5.13 KB, text/plain)
2008-03-13 23:26 UTC, _ pcw
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description _ pcw 2008-03-13 23:26:04 UTC
Opening the JavaMail & Activation freeform projects in NB 6.1 produces an assertion failure.

This problem did not happen in NB 6.0.

Instructions for downloading javamail and activation are here: https://glassfish.dev.java.net/javaee5/mail/
Comment 1 _ pcw 2008-03-13 23:26:26 UTC
Created attachment 58360 [details]
Assertion Failure...
Comment 2 _ pcw 2008-03-14 00:08:37 UTC
One thing to note - I'm running on JDK 6 and portions of JAF are included in JDK6.  Since one of these projects is JAF
itself, there are duplicate classes between the project and the JDK.

IMHO, this should not cause a problem, but it might part of the difficulty.  I observed console messages suggesting the
IDE might not be particularly tolerant of duplication --

WARNING [org.netbeans.modules.java.source.usages.LuceneIndex]: Multiple index entries for binaryName:
Pair[javax.activation.DataHandler$1,null]
WARNING [org.netbeans.modules.java.source.usages.LuceneIndex]: Multiple index entries for binaryName:
Pair[javax.activation.DataHandler,null]
WARNING [org.netbeans.modules.java.source.usages.LuceneIndex]: Multiple index entries for binaryName:
Pair[com.sun.activation.registries.MimeTypeFile,null]

Comment 3 Jan Becicka 2008-03-14 10:38:28 UTC

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 122246 ***