This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 127191 - Cursor wronly shows that drop operation is forbidden
Summary: Cursor wronly shows that drop operation is forbidden
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 127275
Alias: None
Product: obsolete
Classification: Unclassified
Component: visualweb (show other bugs)
Version: 6.x
Hardware: All All
: P3 blocker (vote)
Assignee: Quy Nguyen
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-02-12 12:35 UTC by Roman Mostyka
Modified: 2008-03-21 00:29 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Roman Mostyka 2008-02-12 12:35:41 UTC 
NetBeans 6.0.1 on Linux Ubuntu Hardy.

1. Add some Web Service or EJB.
2. Drag Web Service or EJB or some of their method and move cursor to Designer.

Result: Cursor shows that drop is forbidden, but if drop Web Service or EJB or some of their method onto the page ot
some components everything is fine (if drop onto components then it becomes bound).

On Windwos XP everything is fine.
Comment 1 dlipin 2008-02-12 12:48:36 UTC 
roman,

does that occur in NetBeans installed on the same linux using NBI installer and/or even zip distribution?
Comment 2 Petr Blaha 2008-02-12 13:21:10 UTC 
Roman, is also important to mention which jdk is used for testing. Do you use openJDK?
Comment 3 Roman Mostyka 2008-02-12 17:14:43 UTC 
Product Version: NetBeans IDE 6.0.1 (Build 080206)
Java: 1.6.0-ea; Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM 11.0-b06
System: Linux version 2.6.24-3-generic running on i386; ANSI_X3.4-1968; en_US (nb)

And the same happens with NetBeans installed on the same Linux using NBI installer.
Comment 4 Petr Blaha 2008-02-13 14:21:29 UTC 
The same as issue #127275.
Comment 5 Quy Nguyen 2008-03-21 00:29:10 UTC 
Closing as a duplicate of issue #127275.  There is already a bug filed against the JDK linked from that issue.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 127275 ***