This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 12229 - Better handling of shadows nodes order in the explorer.
Summary: Better handling of shadows nodes order in the explorer.
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 18829
Alias: None
Product: platform
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Window System (show other bugs)
Version: 3.x
Hardware: All All
: P4 blocker (vote)
Assignee: issues@platform
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2001-05-16 15:04 UTC by Jan Zajicek
Modified: 2008-12-22 16:43 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
snapshot (187.09 KB, image/gif)
2001-07-20 20:38 UTC, Jan Zajicek 		Details
snapshot once again (the previous one is erroneous) (9.72 KB, image/gif)
2001-07-20 20:38 UTC, Jan Zajicek 		Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jan Zajicek 2001-05-16 15:04:50 UTC 
Better handling of shadows nodes order in the explorer. Todays situation can be
confusing, see attached snapshot (content of 'c' are links to the content of
'b', note the different/confusing order).
Comment 1 Jan Zajicek 2001-05-16 15:05:37 UTC 
Created attachment 1378 [details]
snapshot
Comment 2 Jan Zajicek 2001-05-16 15:11:50 UTC 
Created attachment 1379 [details]
snapshot once again (the previous one is erroneous)
Comment 3 Jesse Glick 2001-05-16 17:04:22 UTC 
I would vote for this to be WONTFIX. I don't see any clean way of doing this in
general. The links are sorted correctly, considering a folder full of .shadow
objects.
Comment 4 Jan Zajicek 2001-05-17 09:12:28 UTC 
Yes, the nodes are sorted correctly as .shadow objects but from human view they
are unsorted. I didn't know how this can be solved too. However the presented
example isn't typical, more often are the .shadows objects mixed together with
regular files and folders, so marking as resolved remind at this time.
Comment 5 Jesse Glick 2002-02-14 19:53:39 UTC 
x
Comment 6 Jesse Glick 2002-02-14 19:54:22 UTC 

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 18829 ***
Comment 7 Quality Engineering 2003-07-01 16:06:01 UTC 
Resolved for 3.4.x or earlier, no new info since then -> verified.
Comment 8 Quality Engineering 2003-07-01 16:50:15 UTC 
Resolved for 3.4.x or earlier, no new info since then -> closing.