This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 121054 - [60cat] Properties window of EJBs show Name or the bean's name depending on their focus
Summary: [60cat] Properties window of EJBs show Name or the bean's name depending on t...
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: serverplugins
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Sun Appserver 9 (show other bugs)
Version: 6.x
Hardware: PC All
: P4 blocker (vote)
Assignee: Nitya Doraisamy
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-11-03 13:28 UTC by jlaskowski
Modified: 2009-05-25 21:05 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description jlaskowski 2007-11-03 13:28:24 UTC 
[ BUILD # : 200710301200 ]
[ JDK VERSION : 1.6.0_02 ]

Open two properties windows for EJB Modules (from within Services >
Servers > GlassFish V2 > Applications > EJB Modules)
Select the value in the 2nd column of the row with Name - Name is
displayed (in bold) in the lower part of the Properties window (not
the name of the bean)
Switch to the another Properties window and switch back to the
previous (first) Properties window - the name of the bean's
displayed.
Switch to the another window and the value is Name again not the
bean's name.
Comment 1 Petr Hejl 2007-11-05 14:02:44 UTC 
Occurs when clicking to the lower pane, name of the module is displayed and probably rewritten immediately with the last
selected value.

Imo this does not affect functionality - lowering to P4.
Comment 2 Vince Kraemer 2007-11-05 14:30:41 UTC 
I have not reproduced this issue....

Note: when I reselect the Name property... I see its value "flash" in the bottom of the Properties window, but then it
settles on the Name of the Property... this is what other Property Windows appear to do.

[I did my testing on JDK 1.5 though]
Comment 3 Vince Kraemer 2008-12-24 21:57:05 UTC 
not worth worrying about in 7.0 time frame