This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 118274 - Problems with CSS Inline elements
Summary: Problems with CSS Inline elements
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 118178
Alias: None
Product: obsolete
Classification: Unclassified
Component: visualweb (show other bugs)
Version: 6.x
Hardware: Other All
: P3 blocker (vote)
Assignee: Peter Zavadsky
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-10-09 17:45 UTC by _ krystyna
Modified: 2007-10-11 00:49 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
Test Project (27.23 KB, application/octet-stream)
2007-10-09 17:46 UTC, _ krystyna 		Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description _ krystyna 2007-10-09 17:45:25 UTC 
NetBeans IDE Dev (Build 200710081200)
Java: 1.5.0_12; Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM 1.5.0_12-b04
Windows XP


There are two problems with this CSS test when comparing the runtime to
designer
1-the diagram on the left does not image/draw the blue lines
2-the image on the right shows red border on the right and bottom
 in designer but runtime shows red border should be only on top and bottom,
 uniform size.

Attaching project used.  The test is from 
http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Test/CSS2.1/20061011/t090402-c42-ibx-pad-00-d-ag.xht
and requires Ahem font to be installed on the system :  http://www.hixie.ch/resources/fonts/
Comment 1 _ krystyna 2007-10-09 17:46:12 UTC 
Created attachment 50515 [details]
Test Project
Comment 2 Peter Zavadsky 2007-10-10 00:05:35 UTC 
It's there too, it seems to be similar to issue #118178. I need to have a closer look at it. This is a layout problem.
Comment 3 Peter Zavadsky 2007-10-11 00:49:23 UTC 
This issue is a duplicate. The same problem, current layout doesn't take into account paddings, borders, margins of
particular part of text in line (span typically).

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 118178 ***