This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 114368 - [ProfilingPoints] Profiling Points command should be consistent
Summary: [ProfilingPoints] Profiling Points command should be consistent
Status: VERIFIED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: profiler
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Base (show other bugs)
Version: 6.x
Hardware: All All
: P4 blocker (vote)
Assignee: Jiri Sedlacek
URL:
Keywords:
: 116776 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-08-31 13:36 UTC by Maksim Khramov
Modified: 2007-09-27 10:05 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Maksim Khramov 2007-08-31 13:36:53 UTC
Actually we have two places where we can work with profiling points: In Code Editor and in Profiling points window.
But now for same operations in this places we have different names:
'Insert Profiling Point' in java editor but 'Add Profiling Point' in Profiling points window
'Customize' in editor vs. 'Edit' in Profiling Points window
'Delete' in editor vs. 'Remove' in Profiling Points
Comment 1 Jiri Sedlacek 2007-09-04 13:03:49 UTC
Unified terms:
 - Remove -> Delete
 - Customize -> Edit

However, I would keep current Insert vs. Add inconsistency. The actions are actually the same but the context is a bit 
different: in editor Insert Profiling Point means insert the PP at the current cursor position, you cannot insert new 
PP without position context this way. On the other side from Profiling Points Window you can add new Profiling Point 
without having any editor opened (== without position context), that's why the action is Add.

If you agree please close this issue, otherwise please comment.
Comment 2 Maksim Khramov 2007-09-12 14:16:55 UTC
I agree with You about Insert and Add difference.
Comment 3 Jiri Sedlacek 2007-09-21 16:53:29 UTC
Fixed for Beta2.
Comment 4 Jiri Sedlacek 2007-09-26 07:25:48 UTC
*** Issue 116776 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 5 Maksim Khramov 2007-09-27 10:05:09 UTC
Verified in build 200709261200