This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 112998 - java.lang.AssertionError: Not locked. Use Indent.lock()
Summary: java.lang.AssertionError: Not locked. Use Indent.lock()
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 110647
Alias: None
Product: editor
Classification: Unclassified
Component: -- Other -- (show other bugs)
Version: 6.x
Hardware: PC Windows Vista
: P3 blocker (vote)
Assignee: issues@editor
URL: http://statistics.netbeans.org/except...
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-08-16 14:06 UTC by belkorin
Modified: 2007-11-05 13:44 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter: 77

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description belkorin 2007-08-16 14:06:10 UTC 
DON'T DELETE THIS TEXT:

Build: NetBeans IDE Dev (Build 200707241200)
VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM, 1.5.0_10-b03
OS: Windows XP, 5.1, x86
STACKTRACE: (first 10 lines)
java.lang.AssertionError: Not locked. Use Indent.lock()
        at org.netbeans.modules.editor.indent.IndentImpl.reindent(IndentImpl.java:130)
        at org.netbeans.modules.editor.indent.FormatterImpl.indentLine(FormatterImpl.java:75)
        at org.netbeans.modules.editor.indent.FormatterImpl.indentNewLine(FormatterImpl.java:96)
        at org.netbeans.editor.ActionFactory$StartNewLine.actionPerformed(ActionFactory.java:2177)
        at org.netbeans.editor.BaseAction.actionPerformed(BaseAction.java:266)
        at javax.swing.SwingUtilities.notifyAction(SwingUtilities.java:1571)
        at javax.swing.JComponent.processKeyBinding(JComponent.java:2772)
        at javax.swing.JComponent.processKeyBindings(JComponent.java:2807)
        at javax.swing.JComponent.processKeyEvent(JComponent.java:2735)
        at java.awt.Component.processEvent(Component.java:5278)
Comment 1 Jiri Prox 2007-08-16 14:40:44 UTC 
This is duplicate of issue 110647, it should be fixed now. Thanks for your report.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 110647 ***