This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 108714 - Code folding handles dont resize on changing font size in editor
Summary: Code folding handles dont resize on changing font size in editor
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 153316
Alias: None
Product: editor
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Code folding (show other bugs)
Version: 6.x
Hardware: All All
: P4 blocker (vote)
Assignee: issues@editor
URL:
Keywords: RANDOM
Depends on:
Blocks: 142800
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2007-07-03 05:34 UTC by Rohan Ranade
Modified: 2009-05-18 14:25 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
Screenshot of the issue (200.26 KB, image/png)
2007-07-03 05:35 UTC, Rohan Ranade 		Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Rohan Ranade 2007-07-03 05:34:32 UTC 
Please refer the attached screenshot for the scenario.

Steps to reproduce:
1. Opened a Java file in editor
2. Increased the font size from "Monospace 13" to "Monospace 18" by going to Options -> Fonts and Colors dialog. 
3. Editor changes the font size and code folding handles (the '+' signs) correctly
4. Decreased the font size from "Monospace 18" to "Monospace 13" by going to Options -> Fonts and Colors dialog.
5. Editor resizes the text, but *does not* resize the code folding handles.
Comment 1 Rohan Ranade 2007-07-03 05:35:37 UTC 
Created attachment 44646 [details]
Screenshot of the issue
Comment 2 Vitezslav Stejskal 2007-07-03 11:00:30 UTC 
It worked fine when I tried, but the font&colors changes are a bit flaky and I would not be surpriced if something like
this happened.
Comment 3 Jan Becicka 2008-03-03 14:57:36 UTC 
P4. It works for me..
Comment 4 Jiri Prox 2008-04-11 00:41:50 UTC 
moving opened issues from TM <= 6.1 to TM=Dev
Comment 5 Vitezslav Stejskal 2008-08-05 11:10:47 UTC 
*** Issue 142800 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 6 Vitezslav Stejskal 2009-05-18 14:25:28 UTC 
Should work better now.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 153316 ***