This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 108336 - com.sun.tools.javac.util.CouplingAbort after opening JFrame
Summary: com.sun.tools.javac.util.CouplingAbort after opening JFrame
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 102857
Alias: None
Product: java
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Unsupported (show other bugs)
Version: 6.x
Hardware: All All
: P2 blocker (vote)
Assignee: issues@java
URL:
Keywords: T9Y
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-06-27 22:05 UTC by Marian Mirilovic
Modified: 2009-01-22 15:40 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
stack-traces (20.52 KB, text/plain)
2007-06-27 22:05 UTC, Marian Mirilovic 		Details
Dump file (18.42 KB, text/plain)
2007-06-27 22:06 UTC, Marian Mirilovic 		Details
forgoten testing project (172.97 KB, application/octet-stream)
2007-06-28 10:05 UTC, Marian Mirilovic 		Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Marian Mirilovic 2007-06-27 22:05:02 UTC 
NB Dev M10 , JDK 6.0_01

Steps to reproduce:
- unzip attached project
- open JFrame20kB.java file
-> com.sun.tools.javac.util.CouplingAbort rises (see attachment)
- close the same file
-> the same exception rises
- open the same file again
- switch to Welcome
- switch to JFrame
-> few exceptions rises (see attachment)
Comment 1 Marian Mirilovic 2007-06-27 22:05:34 UTC 
Created attachment 44486 [details]
stack-traces
Comment 2 Marian Mirilovic 2007-06-27 22:06:04 UTC 
Created attachment 44487 [details]
Dump file
Comment 3 Marian Mirilovic 2007-06-27 22:07:20 UTC 
Not reproducible with JDK 1.5.0_12 & 100% reproducible on all machines / JDK 6.0_01
Comment 4 Marian Mirilovic 2007-06-28 10:05:28 UTC 
Created attachment 44505 [details]
forgoten testing project
Comment 5 Jiri Prox 2007-06-28 11:04:22 UTC 

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 107609 ***
Comment 6 Jiri Prox 2007-06-28 11:06:27 UTC 
Sorry, I've marked it as duplicate of wrong issue
Comment 7 Jiri Prox 2007-06-28 11:07:12 UTC 
This should be the correct one

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 102857 ***
Comment 8 Quality Engineering 2007-09-20 09:48:38 UTC 
Reorganization of java component
Comment 9 Marian Mirilovic 2009-01-22 15:40:19 UTC 
v/c