This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 107609 - CouplingAbort
Summary: CouplingAbort
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 102857
Alias: None
Product: java
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Unsupported (show other bugs)
Version: 6.x
Hardware: All All
: P2 blocker (vote)
Assignee: issues@java
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-06-21 11:50 UTC by Martin Entlicher
Modified: 2007-09-26 09:14 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
com.sun.tools.javac.util.CouplingAbort (11.69 KB, text/plain)
2007-06-21 11:51 UTC, Martin Entlicher 		Details
Exception (2.32 KB, text/plain)
2007-06-21 16:44 UTC, Alexander Kouznetsov 		Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Martin Entlicher 2007-06-21 11:50:58 UTC 
I've got com.sun.tools.javac.util.CouplingAbort
	at com.sun.tools.javac.comp.MemberEnter.visitVarDef(MemberEnter.java:669)
(full stack trace attached)
when I've opened file debuggercore/test/unit/src/org/netbeans/api/debugger/PropertiesTest.java

Product Version: NetBeans IDE Dev (Build 070615)
Java: 1.6.0_02-ea; Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM 1.6.0_02-ea-b01
System: Linux version 2.6.18-1.2798.fc6 running on i386; UTF-8; en_US (nb)

Where should I submit issues like this? Should they be filled directly at bugs.sun.com, or should it always go through
NetBeans Issuezilla?
Comment 1 Martin Entlicher 2007-06-21 11:51:47 UTC 
Created attachment 44158 [details]
com.sun.tools.javac.util.CouplingAbort
Comment 2 Alexander Kouznetsov 2007-06-21 16:43:23 UTC 
I get this exception too with 

Product Version: NetBeans IDE Dev (Build 200706210000) 
Java: 1.6.0; Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM 1.6.0-b105 
System: Windows XP version 5.1 running on x86; Cp1251; ru_RU (nb)
Comment 3 Alexander Kouznetsov 2007-06-21 16:44:26 UTC 
Created attachment 44194 [details]
Exception
Comment 4 Petr Hrebejk 2007-06-25 12:04:49 UTC 

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 102857 ***
Comment 5 Jiri Prox 2007-06-28 11:04:21 UTC 
*** Issue 108336 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***