This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 10733 - Templates/Classes/Main does not really need a constructor
Summary: Templates/Classes/Main does not really need a constructor
Status: CLOSED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: java
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Unsupported (show other bugs)
Version: 3.x
Hardware: PC Linux
: P4 blocker (vote)
Assignee: issues@java
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2001-03-27 16:03 UTC by Jesse Glick
Modified: 2007-09-26 09:14 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jesse Glick 2001-03-27 16:03:24 UTC 
[release32 mar 25] Why is there a constructor for the Classes/Main
template? Generally if you only care about the main() method, your
class can be abstract or whatever and does not need a constructor.
Whenever I use this template, the first thing I do is delete the
constructor since it just gets in the way.
Comment 1 Jan Chalupa 2001-05-05 23:19:52 UTC 
Target milestone -> 3.3
Comment 2 Svata Dedic 2001-11-19 12:23:43 UTC 
Discussed with HIE - and it was decided to leave it as it is (w/ 
constructor). If unhappy, please speak on nbusers@
Comment 3 Quality Engineering 2003-07-01 13:11:12 UTC 
Resolved for 3.3.x or earlier, no new info since then -> closing.
Comment 4 Quality Engineering 2003-07-01 13:20:55 UTC 
Resolved for 3.4.x or earlier, no new info since then -> closing.
Comment 5 Quality Engineering 2007-09-20 10:51:01 UTC 
Reorganization of java component