This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 105980 - Weird underline for create constructor hint
Summary: Weird underline for create constructor hint
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 99154
Alias: None
Product: java
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Unsupported (show other bugs)
Version: 6.x
Hardware: PC Linux
: P4 blocker (vote)
Assignee: Jan Lahoda
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-06-07 09:35 UTC by Max Sauer
Modified: 2007-09-26 09:14 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:


Attachments
Prosposed screenshot. Note 'a' underlined (This corresponds to class name) (1.57 KB, image/png)
2007-06-07 13:25 UTC, Max Sauer
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Max Sauer 2007-06-07 09:35:15 UTC
See attached screenshot -- when defining a new inner class, appeared hint
undelines just letter 'a' from 'class' keyword.

Steps to reproduce:
-------------------
1) Inside of a public java class, create a new inner class, ie:
class a {
}

---
Product Version: NetBeans IDE Dev (Build 070607) Java: 1.6.0_02-ea; 
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM 1.6.0_02-ea-b02 
System: Linux version 2.6.12-1.1390_FC4smp running on i386; UTF-8; en_US (nb) 
Userdir: /home/ms159439/.netbeans/dev
Comment 1 Max Sauer 2007-06-07 13:25:05 UTC
Created attachment 43384 [details]
Prosposed screenshot. Note 'a' underlined (This corresponds to class name)
Comment 2 Vitezslav Stejskal 2007-06-08 05:04:44 UTC
Yeah, the hint says - 'Utility class without constructur'. If you change the
class' name to 'b' the highlight is correct. It looks like the hint is broken,
but I'm not sure.
Comment 3 Jaroslav Tulach 2007-06-08 07:29:13 UTC
Imho, this is bug in the hint infrastructure, at least I am not sure what I 
would do in wrong way. Jan, please help or reassign back.
Comment 4 Jan Lahoda 2007-07-12 11:12:59 UTC

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 99154 ***