This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 63151

Summary: NBM and suite projects should support move
Product: apisupport Reporter: Jesse Glick <jglick>
Component: ProjectAssignee: Martin Krauskopf <mkrauskopf>
Status: RESOLVED FIXED    
Severity: blocker    
Priority: P1    
Version: 5.x   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT Exception Reporter:

Description Jesse Glick 2005-08-26 11:21:15 UTC
In the case of suite component module projects, should additionally update the
suite's reference to the module, and update the module's reference to the suite.
Comment 1 Martin Krauskopf 2005-09-15 05:01:03 UTC
High priority feature for the next release.
Comment 2 Jesse Glick 2005-10-18 00:13:47 UTC
*** Issue 66081 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 3 Jesse Glick 2005-10-24 19:11:52 UTC
*** Issue 61689 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 4 Martin Krauskopf 2006-01-10 04:39:13 UTC
Move should not be problem. Rename is a little problematic in the case of
apisupport. cf. with dev@apisupport discussion. Filed a new issue 71214 for rename.
Comment 5 Martin Krauskopf 2006-01-11 17:01:38 UTC
Ups. Fixed few hours ago. I forgot to close this. Here is the commit:

http://apisupport.netbeans.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=cvs&msgNo=3074
Comment 6 Martin Krauskopf 2006-01-11 17:19:54 UTC
BTW when suite is moved modules which are relative to its directory are not
moved. Not sure. Probably would be better if we detect which suite components
are in a suite's directory and move them as well, so user doesn't need to do so
for each suite-component. Suite components outside of suite shouldn't be
presuambly touched.
Comment 7 Jesse Glick 2006-01-11 23:37:37 UTC
"Probably would be better if we detect which suite components are in a suite's
directory and move them as well, so user doesn't need to do so for each
suite-component. Suite components outside of suite shouldn't be presuambly
touched." - agreed.
Comment 8 Martin Krauskopf 2006-01-12 04:57:00 UTC
Filed issue 71293.