This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.
| Summary: | [2004-04-19] apireview of masterfs | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | platform | Reporter: | Jaroslav Tulach <jtulach> |
| Component: | Filesystems | Assignee: | rmatous <rmatous> |
| Status: | CLOSED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | blocker | CC: | apireviews, dkonecny, jglick, ttran |
| Priority: | P1 | Keywords: | API_REVIEW |
| Version: | 4.x | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| Issue Type: | DEFECT | Exception Reporter: | |
| Bug Depends on: | 42014, 42038 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | 40703 | ||
|
Description
Jaroslav Tulach
2004-03-12 15:01:48 UTC
Also would like to have a functional spec (can be short but should be up-to-date w.r.t. what the build system needs from it); unit tests; etc. Documentation: http://www.netbeans.org/download/dev/javadoc/MasterFSAPI/index.html http://www.netbeans.org/source/browse/openide/www/proposals/masterfs/MasterFS.html related RFEs http://www.netbeans.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=40344 http://www.netbeans.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=41779 Architecture answers should be finsihed today. Architecture questions were answered: http://www.netbeans.org/source/browse/openide/arch/arch-openide-masterfs.xml The review will be held on Apr 14. I will lead the review, Jaroslav Tulach, Miloslav Metelka and Pavel Buzek will be the other reviewers. I think that the friend contract is most appropriate than general SPI in this case so I changed arch answers and also MasterFS.html with explanation. Then there will be probably necessary to change current public packages: org.netbeans.api.masterfs.*,org.netbeans.spi.masterfs.*. BTW for those frustrated by the previously given link, better to use http://openide.netbeans.org/proposals/masterfs/MasterFS.html I hope this issue can be considered as fixed. The opinion document is here: http://openide.netbeans.org/tutorial/reviews/opinions_40958.html Verified |