This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 212891

Summary: AssertionError: If valid, it should be a folder: ... clazz: class org.netbeans.modules.masterfs.filebasedfs.fileobjects.FileObj
Product: platform Reporter: KhArtNJava
Component: FilesystemsAssignee: Jaroslav Tulach <jtulach>
Status: RESOLVED FIXED    
Severity: normal CC: atlioddsson, exceptions_reporter, haiduongxanh_huy, jglick, wookasz
Priority: P3    
Version: 7.2   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
Issue Type: DEFECT Exception Reporter: 188249
Attachments: stacktrace

Description KhArtNJava 2012-05-23 11:20:13 UTC
This bug was originally marked as duplicate of bug 207504, that is already resolved. This bug is still valid, so this seems to be another bug, but it might be related.

Build: NetBeans IDE Dev (Build 201205200400)
VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM, 22.1-b02, Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment, 1.7.0_03-b05
OS: Windows 7

Stacktrace: 
java.lang.AssertionError: If valid, it should be a folder: C:\Art\MyServer\home\bta.local\www\loan\Art\MyServer\home\bta.local\www\loan@7c30426:1ca26bf clazz: class org.netbeans.modules.masterfs.filebasedfs.fileobjects.FileObj
   at org.netbeans.modules.masterfs.watcher.Watcher$Ext.unregister(Watcher.java:248)
   at org.netbeans.modules.masterfs.watcher.Watcher.unregister(Watcher.java:127)
   at org.netbeans.modules.masterfs.filebasedfs.fileobjects.BaseFileObj.removeFileChangeListener(BaseFileObj.java:519)
   at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor77.invoke(GeneratedMethodAccessor77.java:0)
   at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
   at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:601)
Comment 1 KhArtNJava 2012-05-23 11:20:19 UTC
Created attachment 119771 [details]
stacktrace
Comment 2 Jaroslav Tulach 2012-05-23 14:40:16 UTC
ergonomics#7607d4aeef5a
Comment 3 Jaroslav Tulach 2012-06-01 12:56:50 UTC
*** Bug 213318 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Jaroslav Tulach 2012-06-01 12:57:11 UTC
*** Bug 213348 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Jaroslav Tulach 2012-06-07 14:05:46 UTC
*** Bug 213657 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Jaroslav Tulach 2012-06-07 14:06:03 UTC
*** Bug 213650 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 7 Jaroslav Tulach 2012-06-18 11:45:37 UTC
*** Bug 214297 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8 Jaroslav Havlin 2013-10-21 08:42:52 UTC
*** Bug 237341 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***