This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 179120

Summary: the jsf-extensions library is missing from plugins manager
Product: updatecenters Reporter: Kenneth Ganfield <kganfield>
Component: StableAssignee: Petr Jiricka <pjiricka>
Status: CLOSED INVALID    
Severity: normal CC: alexeybutenko, av-nb, pjiricka
Priority: P2    
Version: 6.x   
Hardware: PC   
OS: Mac OS X   
Issue Type: DEFECT Exception Reporter:

Description Kenneth Ganfield 2009-12-30 04:31:15 UTC
To use the dynafaces/ajax functionality in the ide, the project requires the jsf-extensions library. this library was available from the update center via the plugins manager, but in 6.8 the plugin is not listed. this was working fine in 6.7.

An example of a project that uses the library is available on Kenai:
Consulting Agency Solution Project 

This example project is used in several NetBeans IDE documentation tutorials
Comment 1 Alexey Butenko 2010-01-13 03:18:48 UTC
Is it possible to add it into Stable UC for 6.8?
The module name is web.jsf.extensions
Comment 2 Jiri Kovalsky 2010-01-20 03:26:47 UTC
Petre, do you happen to know why the web.jsf.extensions module was removed from the UC? Thanks for your explanation.
Comment 3 Petr Jiricka 2010-01-20 05:52:41 UTC
Could this be related to the fact that VisualWeb no longer works with 6.8? If this library is not related/dependent on visual web, then I guess it should be published.
Comment 4 Jiri Kovalsky 2010-01-20 06:55:24 UTC
Alexei, can you please comment on this? Thanks!
Comment 5 Alexei Mokeev 2010-01-20 07:41:17 UTC
Sure I can.

It is related to:
https://netbeans.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=164211

and request to publish for 6.7 was handled by Milan Kuchtiak:
https://netbeans.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=164453
Comment 6 Jiri Kovalsky 2010-01-20 09:29:25 UTC
OK, then could you please Roberte stage websvc.jsf.extensions library on the 6.8 Beta UC again? See issue #164453. Thanks!
Comment 7 Marian Mirilovic 2011-11-19 08:06:53 UTC
no more valid - I believe
Comment 8 Marian Mirilovic 2011-11-19 08:31:09 UTC
v/c