This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.
Summary: | Provide a 'remove' button in the 'add framework support' wizard. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | javaee | Reporter: | ieising <ieising> |
Component: | Web Project | Assignee: | Tomas Mysik <tmysik> |
Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | ||
Severity: | blocker | ||
Priority: | P3 | ||
Version: | 6.x | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Windows XP | ||
Issue Type: | DEFECT | Exception Reporter: |
Description
ieising
2007-07-06 21:58:55 UTC
This has been raised for NetBeans 5.5 as well, but after some discussion between developers, it has been decided not to implement such a functionality, as for complex project it's difficult to achieve complete removal of framework. So this "issue" won't be "fixed". Okay, I can understand that removing a framework later on is rather difficult if not impossible, but it should be a breeze to remove it right after it has been added and the dialog hasn't been closed yet. On the other hand, wouldn't removing a framework be a breeze? It is quite the opposite of adding the framework. Showing a warning telling the developer that the action might break his code could solve the problem that I think you see in this. I think having an 'Add' button beckons a 'Remove' button. Iwan See also: http://www.netbeans.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=71408 http://www.netbeans.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72498 Changing the synopsis from 'Can't remove frameworks from web projects' to 'Provide a 'remove' button in the 'add framework support' wizard.' There seems to be two related requests: 1. This issue. Provide a remove button in the 'add framework support' wizard, so that accidentally added framework(s) can be removed *before* closing the wizard. (Somewhat like a cancel button...) 2. The issue 98884. Which is a request for support for removing a framework *after* the wizard is closed and the application project has been created. *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 117571 *** |