This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 31831 - AIOOBException from Window System
Summary: AIOOBException from Window System
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 26291
Alias: None
Product: platform
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Window System (show other bugs)
Version: 3.x
Hardware: PC Windows ME/2000
: P3 blocker (vote)
Assignee: Peter Zavadsky
URL:
Keywords: RANDOM
Depends on:
Blocks: 26206
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2003-03-10 16:12 UTC by Jan Jancura
Modified: 2008-12-22 19:10 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jan Jancura 2003-03-10 16:12:09 UTC 
HTR:
1) start first debugger session (Ted)
2) start second debugger session (ImageViewer)
3) open sessions view in debugger window
4) switch several times between them (doubleclick)

java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 5 >= 5

	at java.util.Vector.elementAt(Vector.java:427)

	at
javax.swing.JTabbedPane.getComponentAt(JTabbedPane.java:1015)

	at
javax.swing.JTabbedPane.getSelectedComponent(JTabbedPane.java:495)

	at
org.netbeans.core.windows.frames.SplitContainerImpl.componentRemoved(SplitContainerImpl.java:733)

	at
org.netbeans.core.windows.frames.DefaultContainerImpl.removeTopComponent(DefaultContainerImpl.java:667)

	at
org.netbeans.core.windows.ModeImpl$2.performCommand(ModeImpl.java:581)

	at
org.netbeans.core.windows.DeferredPerformer.processCommand(DeferredPerformer.java:195)

	at
org.netbeans.core.windows.DeferredPerformer.putRequest(DeferredPerformer.java:89)

	at
org.netbeans.core.windows.ModeImpl.close(ModeImpl.java:570)

	at
org.netbeans.core.windows.WindowManagerImpl$TopComponentManager.doClose(WindowManagerImpl.java:1734)

	at
org.netbeans.core.windows.WindowManagerImpl$TopComponentManager.close(WindowManagerImpl.java:1674)

	at
org.openide.windows.TopComponent.close(TopComponent.java:286)

	at
org.openide.windows.TopComponent.close(TopComponent.java:257)

[catch] at
org.netbeans.core.output.OutputTabTerm$2.run(OutputTabTerm.java:531)

	at
java.awt.event.InvocationEvent.dispatch(InvocationEvent.java:178)

	at
java.awt.EventQueue.dispatchEvent(EventQueue.java:443)

	at
java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpOneEventForHierarchy(EventDispatchThread.java:191)

	at
java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForHierarchy(EventDispatchThread.java:144)

	at
java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(EventDispatchThread.java:138)

	at
java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(EventDispatchThread.java:130)

	at
java.awt.EventDispatchThread.run(EventDispatchThread.java:98)
Comment 1 David Strupl 2003-03-10 16:14:06 UTC 
When you say window system please use subcomponent window system. Thanks.
Comment 2 Jan Jancura 2003-03-10 17:32:41 UTC 
This bug occures too often.
Some other ugly bug depends on this one.
Comment 3 Peter Zavadsky 2003-03-11 08:14:52 UTC 
Which jdk do you use? It doesn't seem it is 1.4.1 (can you reproduce
it also with that one?)
Comment 4 Peter Zavadsky 2003-03-11 08:40:47 UTC 
I don't understand those steps. 

Are they correct?
Which component is supposed to be closed by them?
Comment 5 Peter Zavadsky 2003-03-11 09:08:56 UTC 
I can't reproduce it neither on jdk1.4.1 nor jdk1.3.1. Please if you
do, let me know.

It has the same stack trace like issue #26291 (tending to mark this as
a duplicate), but it's also not reproducible for me.
Comment 6 Jan Jancura 2003-03-12 08:55:19 UTC 
1) I use JDK 1.4.0_01
2) steps are correct
3) Which component is supposed to be closed by them? - I do not know -
its Window Syste code - probably some tab in output window.
4) I can not reproduce it on new build. I think that its some timing
problem. I was testing it on slower environment...
Comment 7 Peter Zavadsky 2003-03-13 09:10:54 UTC 
Since it isn't reproducible, lowering priority, and going to mark it
as a duplicate.
Comment 8 Peter Zavadsky 2003-03-13 09:12:49 UTC 
Marking as duplicate (same stack trace).
Please raise priority if you can reproduce it.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 26291 ***
Comment 9 Marian Mirilovic 2003-07-22 16:48:58 UTC 
verified, closed - it's duplicate.