This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 50944 - Split j2eeserver module into smaller parts
Summary: Split j2eeserver module into smaller parts
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: serverplugins
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Infrastructure (show other bugs)
Version: 4.x
Hardware: PC Linux
: P3 blocker (vote)
Assignee: Sherold Dev
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: 40771 55325
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2004-10-28 12:20 UTC by Jaroslav Tulach
Modified: 2006-12-01 10:33 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jaroslav Tulach 2004-10-28 12:20:45 UTC 
During the j2eeserver review we noticed that the
module in fact provides more than one set of
functionality. It might be wise to split the
module into smaller, more logically organized units.

What is definitevely suggest is to separate the UI
parts of the module from the API. The API should
be autoload and it is pretty bad when UI is
changing due to some other module depending on the
module or not.

Also connecting the API and UI make it imposible
to provide alternative presentation of the
functionality, which was said to be needed by
project rave.
Comment 1 Sherold Dev 2005-02-18 13:27:08 UTC 
It is too late to fix this in 4.1 -> setting the TM to promo-F.
Comment 2 Petr Blaha 2006-03-13 13:51:03 UTC 
TM 5.0 -> TBD
Comment 3 Sherold Dev 2006-05-31 14:16:19 UTC 
changing the type from defect to task, since this is not a real issue
Comment 4 Jaroslav Tulach 2006-12-01 10:33:18 UTC 
This issue (as several others which I am changing at once) as a TCR or TCA, 
but it is not a defect. As I am aware of our attitude towards non-defects - 
e.g. ignore them, I believe it is safe to assume that these issues are never 
going to be fixed. As such I am closing them. If anyone believes that this 
issue is important to be fixed, then please reopen. In such case I suggest to 
track it then as a defect.