This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 84070

Summary: A11Y / I18N - Reverse Engineer query dialog - fontsize issues
Product: uml Reporter: bugbridge <bugbridge>
Component: Reverse EngineeringAssignee: issues@uml <issues>
Status: CLOSED INVALID    
Severity: blocker CC: kfrank, mbudris
Priority: P2 Keywords: A11Y, I18N
Version: 5.x   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
Issue Type: DEFECT Exception Reporter:
Attachments: image

Description bugbridge 2006-09-01 22:53:08 UTC
Original status: 4-Defer; Suggested Status: RESOLVED (Resolution:REMIND)

Original Target Release: bow-dev; Suggested Target Milestone : 5.5

These items should be added to the Keywords: A11Y
Original submitter: kfrank

Description:
Note - these issues can involve either/or
	- not all of a dialog or window showing all its contents without
	requiring user to resize it 
	- not showing some/all of its labels/msgs at the user chosen font
	size (-fontsize option to starting ide)

Note - also A11Y considerations

see attached gif(s) for more information

Assumption - user can start ide with -fontsize option and all parts of ide
should use this fontsize

some parts of dialog - see attached, do not show at proper user chosen
fontsize

Evaluation:
Change dialog type to handle varying font sizes
2004-09-15


Comments:
I backed out the changes when I noticed that the behaviour in netbeans is
similar to this...for instance  If I raise the fontsize in netbeans to -18 en
and edit a java file and try to close the file notice the do you want to save
dialog..the message text is not shown in larger font...I don't wnat to deviate
from this behaviour ...can you verify that my observation is correct...andif so
lets close this bug
2004-09-16
Comment 1 Peter Lam 2006-09-01 22:54:04 UTC
Created attachment 33529 [details]
image
Comment 2 Peter Lam 2006-10-06 07:59:18 UTC
This bug is no longer valid with the current redesign of reverse engineering
function.
Comment 3 Peter Lam 2006-11-30 08:01:09 UTC
verified.