Bug 80495

Based on package/class/method name report back some higher level values for how
much time was spent in what sorts of processing.

In other words, a reporting filter/aggregation feature.  The user could select
pre-defined sets of "functionalities."  As an example, a "SOAP functionality"
feature would be defined with the following root methods:

Parsing + SOAP protocol handling, the sum of the following entry points :
com.sun.xml.ws.protocol.soap.server.SOAPMessageDispatcher#toMessageInfo
com.sun.xml.ws.protocol.soap.server.SOAPDecoder#doMustUnderstandProcessing
com.sun.xml.ws.protocol.soap.server.SOAPMessageDispatcher#getSOAPMessage

Serialization :
com.sun.xml.ws.protocol.soap.server.SOAPMessageDispatcher#makeSOAPMessage

Time spent in the endpoint itself:
com.sun.xml.ws.protocol.soap.server.SOAPMessageDispatcher#invokeEndpoint

Sending a reply (network there):
com.sun.xml.ws.protocol.soap.server.SOAPMessageDispatcher#sendResponse

Then when the "SOAP functionality" filter is chosen by the user the Profiler
would report CPU time in a report that contains something like:

Parsing + SOAP protocol handling: 25%
Serialization : 20%
Time spent in the endpoint itself: 10%
Sending a reply (network): 45% 

Having stacked/aggregation of functionality profiles would be the ideal feature.

For example, the user could say "This is a J2EE application, could you present
to me the time spent in each J2EE component?" Examples would be: Web Container,
EJB, DataBase, Transaction, JMX, etc. So J2EE would be a profile of
functionalities composed by the aggregation of finer profiles (EJB, db, etc).
The SOAP profile described above could be a profile contained by the Web
container profile, etc.

Another example would be: "This is a J2SE application that accesses a web
service for data that is then drawn using Java2D."  The user might want to know
how much time is spent marshalling/unmarshalling the data, how much time in
rendering, etc.