This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 40594

Summary: Request change of module display categories
Product: java Reporter: Jesse Glick <jglick>
Component: JUnitAssignee: junit-issues@java <junit-issues>
Status: VERIFIED FIXED    
Severity: blocker CC: issues, jskrivanek, pkeegan
Priority: P3 Keywords: SIMPLEFIX, UI
Version: 3.x   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
Issue Type: DEFECT Exception Reporter:
Attachments: Suggested patch

Description Jesse Glick 2004-02-27 19:32:01 UTC 
Currently all testing tool modules live in a
display category "TestTools". This includes junit,
which is included in the standard distribution
now. The name "TestTools" is poor for a display
name and it looks bad in the Modules node in
Options; should at least have a space in it.
Suggest change to "Testing Tools" (to clarify that
the tool itself is not experimental) or even "Code
Testing". Attaching possible patch.
Comment 1 Jesse Glick 2004-02-27 19:32:43 UTC 
Created attachment 13716 [details]
Suggested patch
Comment 2 Jesse Glick 2004-02-27 19:33:33 UTC 
Change of component to emphasize that the main problem is the
poor-looking category in the 3.6 IDE.
Comment 3 Marian Petras 2004-03-01 17:03:13 UTC 
I am going to fix it in NetBeans 3.6.
Comment 4 Jiri Skrivanek 2004-03-01 17:26:00 UTC 
Are you going to fix it for all "TestTools" modules or only for junit?
if(yes) {
  thanks;
} else {
  let me know;
  I fix it;
}
Comment 5 Marian Petras 2004-03-01 17:54:01 UTC 
In JUnit only.
Comment 6 Marian Petras 2004-03-01 17:54:47 UTC 
Fixed in the trunk.
Comment 7 Jiri Skrivanek 2004-03-01 18:29:18 UTC 
Fixed also in modules jemmy, jemmysupport, jellytools, testtools as
Jesse suggested.
Comment 8 dmladek 2004-09-17 16:26:25 UTC 
It's OK for JUnit module at least. 

On autoupdate center for latest DEV (4.0) build #20040917-0519 (and
all recent builds) there's now available any module to download, so
I'm not able to verify it in this way:-/
Comment 9 Martin Schovanek 2004-11-15 12:11:45 UTC 
V