This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 31375

Summary:	Patch in support for 26640 (in module autoupdate)
Product:	platform	Reporter:	_ mihmax <mihmax>
Component:	Autoupdate	Assignee:	_ mihmax <mihmax>
Status:	RESOLVED INVALID
Severity:	blocker	Keywords:	I18N
Priority:	P3
Version:	3.x
Hardware:	All
OS:	All
Issue Type:	TASK	Exception Reporter:
Attachments:	Patch file Correct patch file

Description _ mihmax 2003-02-23 01:35:00 UTC

Mostly all the files in autoupdate/src/... use
setText +
setMnemonic/setDisplayedMnemonic instead of
org.openide.awt.setLocalizedText, see issue 26640 for 
details.

The following file is a diff (unified format),
against the trunk for all the affected files:
.form, .java, .properties

Please, commit ASAP

Comment 1 _ mihmax 2003-02-23 01:38:47 UTC

Created attachment 9102 [details]
Patch file

Comment 2 _ mihmax 2003-02-23 16:45:04 UTC

Created attachment 9104 [details]
Correct patch file

Comment 3 _ mihmax 2003-02-23 16:47:43 UTC

Ooops, sorry, please don't mind the first patch, the correct one is
31375-correct.diff

Please, commit ASAP

Comment 4 Petr Hrebejk 2003-02-25 09:58:19 UTC

Hmm, huge. I'm not against applying the patch. I suppose that you want
me to do it for 3.5. I think I can, but I have one question what
should all the questionmarks in the generated code do.

-    // End of variables declaration//GEN-END:variables
+    // ????? ?????????? ??????????//GEN-END:variables

I'd rather see it corrected before I patch the files.
Thanks.

Comment 5 _ mihmax 2003-02-25 10:13:28 UTC

Please postpone commiting these patches, they should be 
rewritten. See Jesse's comment in issue 31372.

Comment 6 _ mihmax 2003-02-25 10:24:40 UTC

yes, huge, but this is how Form Editor works - he sorts 
variable declarations depending on a moon phase.

// ??????????????????? 
are in Russian (I use Russian NetBeans), I'll use 
"-locale en" for the next patch

Comment 7 _ mihmax 2003-06-19 16:24:57 UTC

After resolution of issue 27009 the patch will be absolutely
different, so closing this as INVALID so far.