This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 226831

Summary: Go To File doesn't work
Product: java Reporter: FiruzzZ
Component: NavigationAssignee: Tomas Zezula <tzezula>
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE    
Severity: normal    
Priority: P3    
Version: 7.3   
Hardware: PC   
OS: Windows XP   
Issue Type: DEFECT Exception Reporter:
Attachments: IDE log

Description FiruzzZ 2013-02-28 11:43:33 UTC 
Pressing ALT + SHIFT + O, typing the name of the JDialog, getting the .java/.form, press Enter on any of both but nothing happends

Product Version = NetBeans IDE 7.3 (Build 201302132200)
Operating System = Windows XP version 5.1 running on x86
Java; VM; Vendor = 1.6.0_13
Runtime = Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM 11.3-b02
Comment 1 FiruzzZ 2013-02-28 11:43:40 UTC 
Created attachment 132007 [details]
IDE log
Comment 2 FiruzzZ 2013-02-28 20:26:55 UTC 
Doesn't work with JFrame, JDialog, JPanel..
Comment 3 Jiri Prox 2013-03-01 14:16:23 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 226079 ***
Comment 4 Tomas Zezula 2013-03-04 10:51:02 UTC 
The JFrame, JDialog, JPanel are not a part of the project (the files JFrame.java, JDialog.java, JPanel.java are not included in project sources) it's correct that go to file does not display them.
Comment 5 FiruzzZ 2013-03-04 11:01:11 UTC 
(In reply to comment #4)
> The JFrame, JDialog, JPanel are not a part of the project (the files
> JFrame.java, JDialog.java, JPanel.java are not included in project sources)
> it's correct that go to file does not display them.

Guess my lacking of explanation made u misunderstood the problem:
The function Go To File doesn't work with any "Form.." created, which extends from JFrame, JDialog, JPanel.

but here is a good one:
<a href="show_bug.cgi?id=226079" title="NEW - Go To File doesn't open java part of the Swing form">bug 226079</a>
Comment 6 Tomas Zezula 2013-03-04 11:03:40 UTC 
Thanks for clarification!
In this case the original evaluation done by Jirka was correct.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 226079 ***