This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 170026

Summary: StackOverflowError at java.lang.Character.codePointAt
Product: projects Reporter: Michal Mocnak <mmocnak>
Component: MavenAssignee: Milos Kleint <mkleint>
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE    
Severity: blocker CC: jglick, jiriprox
Priority: P4    
Version: 6.x   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
URL: http://statistics.netbeans.org/exceptions/detail.do?id=155199
Issue Type: DEFECT Exception Reporter: 155199
Attachments: stacktrace

Description Michal Mocnak 2009-08-07 09:32:37 UTC
Build: NetBeans IDE Dev (Build 200908070201)
VM: Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM, 11.3-b02-83, Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment, 1.6.0_13-b03-211
OS: Mac OS X, 10.5.8, x86_64

User Comments:
mmocnak: Opening the maven project (pom)



Stacktrace: 
java.lang.StackOverflowError
        at java.lang.Character.codePointAt(Character.java:2335)
        at java.util.regex.Pattern$CharProperty.match(Pattern.java:3344)
        at java.util.regex.Pattern$Branch.match(Pattern.java:4114)
        at java.util.regex.Pattern$GroupHead.match(Pattern.java:4168)
        at java.util.regex.Pattern$Loop.match(Pattern.java:4295)
        at java.util.regex.Pattern$GroupTail.match(Pattern.java:4227)
Comment 1 Michal Mocnak 2009-08-07 09:32:42 UTC
Created attachment 85951 [details]
stacktrace
Comment 2 Jiri Prox 2009-08-13 14:28:53 UTC
Can you reproduce it?
I can not see which module is responsible for the regexp call, the stacktrace is tool long.
Comment 3 Milos Kleint 2009-08-13 14:48:17 UTC
do you have a reproducible test case or was it a random one time event? what packaging is the project?
Comment 4 Michal Mocnak 2009-09-21 14:51:50 UTC
I cannot reproduce it anymore. It's  a random one time event. I have a pom packaging project which has 7 modules (some jars and wars packaging). 
Downgrading to P4.
Comment 5 Jesse Glick 2010-07-28 15:49:17 UTC
Probably a dupe.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 154894 ***