This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 169047

Summary: HTML in debugger console tab title
Product: platform Reporter: Vojtech Sigler <vsigler>
Component: Output WindowAssignee: t_h <t_h>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE    
Severity: blocker CC: mentlicher
Priority: P3    
Version: 6.x   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Issue Type: DEFECT Exception Reporter:
Attachments: HTML in javaFX debugger console tab title
HTML in java debugger console tab title

Description Vojtech Sigler 2009-07-23 13:37:18 UTC 
Product Version: NetBeans IDE 6.7.1 (Build 200907230233)
Java: 1.6.0_15; Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM 14.1-b02
System: Linux version 2.6.28-13-generic running on i386; UTF-8; en_US (nb)

With both javaFX and java enabled, there is sometimes HTML in the tab title for debugger console. Usually something like:

<html><b>Debugger Console </b>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</html>

It happens in both java debugger and javafx debugger. When I start debugging, the title of debugger console repeatedly
flashes from "Debugger Console" to "<project_name> (debug)" (in bold) and also to the same in HTML.

It is not reproducible in 100% cases, but usually within a few tries. My steps to reproduce:

1) Start with clean userdir
2) open a javafx project
3) open a javase project
4) debug either of the projects
5) if it doesn't occur, stop debugging and debug the other project
6) if neccessary, repeat step 5 a few times
Comment 1 Vojtech Sigler 2009-07-23 13:38:16 UTC 
Created attachment 85132 [details]
HTML in javaFX debugger console tab title
Comment 2 Vojtech Sigler 2009-07-23 13:39:28 UTC 
Created attachment 85133 [details]
HTML in java debugger console tab title
Comment 3 Martin Entlicher 2009-07-29 17:34:31 UTC 
We open the tab via: IOProvider.getDefault ().getIO (title, true);
We do not add HTML, therefore it must be a bug in the code that creates the window title...
Comment 4 t_h 2009-07-30 11:07:19 UTC 

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 113388 ***
Comment 5 Marian Mirilovic 2011-02-23 17:42:55 UTC 
v/c