This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.
| Summary: | Wrong class type | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | uml | Reporter: | fast9877 <fast9877> |
| Component: | Reverse Engineering | Assignee: | issues@uml <issues> |
| Status: | NEW --- | ||
| Severity: | blocker | CC: | gvasick |
| Priority: | P2 | ||
| Version: | 6.x | ||
| Hardware: | PC | ||
| OS: | Windows XP | ||
| Issue Type: | DEFECT | Exception Reporter: | |
| Attachments: |
Wrong class type in UML reverse project
A J2EE project |
||
|
Description
fast9877
2008-08-30 16:56:08 UTC
Can you provide more details? Best if it's possible to attach java project and specify what classes are missed from corresponding uml project. if it's not possible to attach may be some information about project/classes structure, names etc in order to reproduce the issue. Created attachment 68791 [details]
Wrong class type in UML reverse project
Please open the attached picture and you will see many void class show wrong type in reverse engineering UML project. I have test the bank example and void type is correctly showing up. Any help ? We still need more information. We are not able to replicate this behavior in our test. Can you give us any detail about your code for us to replicate? Created attachment 68970 [details]
A J2EE project
Hi ! I attach the source code folder of a J2EE project which you can reproduce the wrong class type case. You may need to create WEB-INF folder and put some .jar files to let MQAccess.java and MQBean.java can pass the compiling. Looking forward a good news from you ! Thanks, Allen I can reproduce in 6.5 wrong return types with attached sources, even there is no package from screenshot. good to evaluate in 7.0 if can be fixed, but may be waived as well. |