This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 143583

Summary: Duplicate report not recognized
Product: ide Reporter: Lukas Hasik <lhasik>
Component: Exceptions ReporterAssignee: Jindrich Sedek <jsedek>
Status: RESOLVED FIXED    
Severity: blocker CC: blaha, jhorvath, mmirilovic
Priority: P1    
Version: 6.x   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
Issue Type: DEFECT Exception Reporter:

Description Lukas Hasik 2008-08-12 10:33:21 UTC
ex.reports 
http://statistics.netbeans.org/analytics/detail.do?id=89307
http://statistics.netbeans.org/analytics/detail.do?id=89306
are similar but there are not duplicates and has been filled into issuezilla as separate issues 143495 and 143496
Comment 1 Lukas Hasik 2008-08-12 19:34:28 UTC
happens again
http://www.netbeans.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=143662
http://www.netbeans.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=143620
are duplicates of 143051
Comment 3 Lukas Hasik 2008-08-13 14:53:27 UTC
another duplicate of issue 143051 reported as new issue 143758

increasing priority to P1. The first 3 lines of the stacktrace are similar therefore there have to be a problem with
algorithm recognizing the duplicates

java.lang.AssertionError: tn must be our child!
        at org.openide.explorer.view.VisualizerChildren.recomputeIndexes(VisualizerChildren.java:94)
        at org.openide.explorer.view.VisualizerChildren.getIndex(VisualizerChildren.java:161)
        at org.openide.explorer.view.VisualizerNode.getIndex(VisualizerNode.java:276)
Comment 4 Jindrich Sedek 2008-08-17 14:26:39 UTC
fixed.
changeset 61437ad728a7 in main/misc
details: http://hg.netbeans.org/main/misc?cmd=changeset;node=61437ad728a7
description:
	issue #143583 - non recognized duplicates -> many duplicates distinct on line number depth+1
Comment 5 Lukas Hasik 2008-09-02 08:09:05 UTC
could you evaluate why all duplicates of issue 142725 were reported as new issues?
Comment 6 Jindrich Sedek 2008-09-02 08:26:01 UTC
The stacktraces are different on the third line -> two same lines are not enough for the algorithm to mark stacktraces
as duplicates. :-(