This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 120693

Summary: IllegalStateException renaming package
Product: platform Reporter: Lark Fitzgerald <lfitzgerald>
Component: Data SystemsAssignee: Denis Anisimov <ads>
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE    
Severity: blocker    
Priority: P3    
Version: 6.x   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
Issue Type: DEFECT Exception Reporter:
Attachments: error

Description Lark Fitzgerald 2007-10-31 18:39:18 UTC 
Product Version: NetBeans IDE Dev (Build 20071031110342)
Java: 1.6.0_03; Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM 1.6.0_03-b02
System: Windows Vista version 6.0 running on x86; Cp1252; en_US (nb)
Glassfish: 58g
Woodstock 4.1: Build 15 RC1

See issue:
http://www.netbeans.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=107714

Attempt to rename package containing page fragment gives error in console.

Steps:
1. create a folder called abc
2. create a page fragment inside of abc
3. rename abc to something else

the package renames, but the ide log shows an error (full exception attached):
java.lang.IllegalStateException: Warning - the node "test" [org.openide.loaders.
DataFolder$FolderNode] is trying to fire the property files which is not include
d in its property sets. This is illegal. See IZ #31413 for details.
        at org.openide.nodes.Node.firePropertyChange(Node.java:929)
        at org.openide.loaders.DataNode.access$900(DataNode.java:61)
Comment 1 Lark Fitzgerald 2007-10-31 18:40:07 UTC 
Created attachment 52170 [details]
error
Comment 2 _ sandipchitale 2007-10-31 18:54:13 UTC 
This is a warning message coming from "test" folder. Were you using a folder named "test"? From the steps I don't think
so. In any case you may want to move the bug it to loaders. Currently I am making it as future.
Comment 3 Lark Fitzgerald 2007-10-31 20:27:27 UTC 
yes (sorry about that), in this case I renamed it to test.  Which loaders?
Comment 4 _ sandipchitale 2007-10-31 22:22:51 UTC 
openide/datasystems
Comment 5 Lark Fitzgerald 2007-11-01 15:40:14 UTC 
reassigning
Comment 6 Jaroslav Tulach 2007-11-02 18:19:37 UTC 
Just a warning, as far as I can tell.
Comment 7 Denis Anisimov 2008-03-17 14:05:07 UTC 
Thу reasons of this issue are exactly the same as for IZ#120560.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 120560 ***