This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.
| Summary: | Default server is not being picked up | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | javaee | Reporter: | Lukas Jungmann <jungi> |
| Component: | Web Project | Assignee: | Radko Najman <rnajman> |
| Status: | VERIFIED DUPLICATE | ||
| Severity: | blocker | CC: | sherold |
| Priority: | P2 | Keywords: | REGRESSION, T9Y, TEST, USABILITY |
| Version: | 6.x | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Issue Type: | DEFECT | Exception Reporter: | |
|
Description
Lukas Jungmann
2007-06-26 15:34:45 UTC
It sounds to me much more as an enhancement that a defect. It wouldn't say it ever worked by this way so why a regression? The project support was design to inform the user that server reference is broken and allow him to solve it, not to automatically set the server if the problem appears. It worked as I described in 5.5, 5.5.1 and around 6.0 M9, therefore it is a regression. Or maybe a bug in older releases? AFAIK resolve missing server dialog was shown only if there were > 1 instances of servers of particular type, but I can be wrong with the condition... Interesting, there are features which I don't know, I'm still learning new things :-) I've just discussed this with Stepan and the problem is caused by the change in the GF plugin. It have to be (and already was) fixed in tests => marking this issue INVALID This is still valid :( It can be only workarounded by resolving missing server in tests => reopening.... and marking as a dup of issue 108830, which is about the same thing *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 108830 *** v. |