This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.
use them for NFT wizard and have them for future
Must-have features for milestone3, have impact on APIs (at least potential).
Pavel, we discussed this issue with Vita and I was convinced by him that we should not implement a general mapping between DataObjects and Natures. The definition of the mapping itself is not problem - it is just a registry place and an reading (internal) API. The motivation behind this decission was that creating something general like this which won't be used in current version and for which we don't have concrete use cases doesn't make sense. So instead of "Dependencies between natures and Data Objects" this issue should be "Dependencies between natures and Templates". If you have some comments or questions write them here and/or let's talk about them tomorrow on the meeting.
Implementation: Checking in java/src/org/netbeans/modules/java/project/CPRootLook.java; new revision: 1.1.2.4; previous revision: 1.1.2.3 Checking in java/src/org/netbeans/modules/java/project/PackageLook.java; new revision: 1.1.2.4; previous revision: 1.1.2.3 Checking in java/src/org/netbeans/modules/java/resources/mf-layer.xml; new revision: 1.26.6.11; previous revision: 1.26.6.10 Checking in projects/patches/lib/patches/openide-patch.jar; new revision: 1.1.2.5; previous revision: 1.1.2.4 Checking in projects/src/org/netbeans/api/projects/wizards/WizardSupport.java; new revision: 1.1.2.3; previous revision: 1.1.2.2 Checking in projects/src/org/netbeans/modules/projects/wizards/TemplatesFilter.java; new revision: 1.1.2.1; previous revision: 1.1
Documented in <http://projects.netbeans.org/proposals/natures/mapping_templates_natures.html>
Done.
See also issue 26327.
David, how do you plan to get rid of patched version of TemplateWizard and NewTemplateAction? I would like to get rid of both core-patch.jar and openide-patch.jar till the end of pm3.
Vita, it is recorded as issue 26327. I want to implement it for M3 too. I will ressurect the discussion on openide and will ask for integration of my patch into openide. David
i've verified all these issues
closing all my verified issues