This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 253709 - Unable to expand Remote Glasfish node
Summary: Unable to expand Remote Glasfish node
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 254087
Alias: None
Product: serverplugins
Classification: Unclassified
Component: GlassFish (show other bugs)
Version: 8.1
Hardware: Macintosh Mac OS X
: P3 normal (vote)
Assignee: Petr Hejl
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2015-07-24 05:21 UTC by satory
Modified: 2015-08-07 12:05 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description satory 2015-07-24 05:21:32 UTC 
[ JDK VERSION : 1.8.0_45 ]

STEPS

While performing the test Remote Application Node for the Netcat Beta readiness
check, when I have 1 server set up locally with a domain called domain1, which
is running a webapp, and I have another server running remotely pointing to
localhost and the domain domain1, I should be able to expand the server node
down to see the running application


ACTUAL:
   Not able to expand remote server node, at all

EXPECTED:
   should be able to expand the node and view the running applications, etc.
Comment 1 Petr Hejl 2015-07-30 06:51:32 UTC 
Please provide a link to the test case.
Comment 2 muellermi 2015-08-02 21:26:36 UTC 
These are the steps:

1. Run project (F6) again and expand "Servers|GlassFish Remote|Applications" node
2. An error message dialog should appear about possible security risks (bug 208376)
3. Right-click "GlassFish Default" server node and choose "View Domain Admin Console"
3. In browser click "Change Administrator Password" 
4. ...

Due to previous test cases, the app runs on the default server. The remote server points to the localhost, which runs now.
The original problem is, the NB does not recognize the status of any remote server, see issue 254087
Comment 3 Petr Hejl 2015-08-07 12:05:31 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 254087 ***