Created attachment 136363 [details]
Sample project

For some scenarios, the continuation should be nested. Take a look at the sample below (I had to extend the text area at Chrome to see it correctly):

final WebArchive war = ShrinkWrap
        .create(WebArchive.class, archiveName)
        .addPackages(
                true,
                //Arquillian
                ArquillianUtils.class.getPackage(),
                //Infra
                GenericsUtil.class.getPackage(),
                ApplicationContextHolder.class.getPackage(),
                ConnectionProvider.class.getPackage(), ResourcesFactory.class.getPackage(),
                //Abstracts
                AbstractEntity.class.getPackage(), AbstractService.class.getPackage(),
                EntityValidationException.class.getPackage(),
                //Testes com specs
                Specification.class.getPackage(), PessoaBasicSpec.class.getPackage())
        .addAsResource("test-persistence.xml", "META-INF/persistence.xml")
        .addAsWebInfResource(EmptyAsset.INSTANCE, "beans.xml");

After addPackages it is better to see the nested parameters intended as the sample shows, but NB just ignore it and shows as:

final WebArchive war = ShrinkWrap
        .create(WebArchive.class, archiveName)
        .addPackages(
        true,
        //Arquillian
        ArquillianUtils.class.getPackage(),
        //Infra
        GenericsUtil.class.getPackage(),
        ApplicationContextHolder.class.getPackage(),
        ConnectionProvider.class.getPackage(), ResourcesFactory.class.getPackage(),
        //Abstracts
        AbstractEntity.class.getPackage(), AbstractService.class.getPackage(),
        EntityValidationException.class.getPackage(),
        //Testes com specs
        Specification.class.getPackage(), PessoaBasicSpec.class.getPackage())
        .addAsResource("test-persistence.xml", "META-INF/persistence.xml")
        .addAsWebInfResource(EmptyAsset.INSTANCE, "beans.xml");

For me it is a wrong behaviour. This kind of indentation should be nested, even if we have more levels.

There is another behaviour that I think is wrong:

log.log(Level.WARNING, "[{0}] {1}.", new Object[]{cv.getPropertyPath().
    toString(), cv.getMessage()});

Why is it not considered a continuation and follow the size 8 I'd defined at the project configuration? It is using the indentation size instead continuation size, which is the correct behaviour here.

I am attaching a sample project with some sample files. You can see the class nb.Class at lines 14, 19 and 32 where I have added some comments about the issues in each line.