This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 223894 - NullPointerException at org.tmatesoft.sqljet.core.internal.table.SqlJetBtreeTable.getValues
Summary: NullPointerException at org.tmatesoft.sqljet.core.internal.table.SqlJetBtreeT...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 220377
Alias: None
Product: ide
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Code (show other bugs)
Version: 7.3
Hardware: All All
: P3 normal (vote)
Assignee: issues@ide
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2012-12-16 14:17 UTC by schkovich
Modified: 2012-12-17 10:00 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter: 196625


Attachments
stacktrace (5.97 KB, text/plain)
2012-12-16 14:17 UTC, schkovich
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description schkovich 2012-12-16 14:17:54 UTC
This bug was originally marked as duplicate of bug 220377, that is already resolved. This bug is still valid, so this seems to be another bug, but it might be related.

Build: NetBeans IDE 7.3 Beta 2 (Build 201211062253)
VM: Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM, 23.6-b04, Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment, 1.7.0_10-b18
OS: Linux

User Comments:
schkovich: svn update




Stacktrace: 
java.lang.NullPointerException
   at org.tmatesoft.sqljet.core.internal.table.SqlJetBtreeTable.getValues(SqlJetBtreeTable.java:456)
   at org.tmatesoft.sqljet.core.internal.table.SqlJetTableDataCursor$16.run(SqlJetTableDataCursor.java:247)
   at org.tmatesoft.sqljet.core.table.SqlJetDb$3.run(SqlJetDb.java:240)
   at org.tmatesoft.sqljet.core.table.engine.SqlJetEngine$12.runSynchronized(SqlJetEngine.java:533)
   at org.tmatesoft.sqljet.core.table.engine.SqlJetEngine.runSynchronized(SqlJetEngine.java:217)
   at org.tmatesoft.sqljet.core.table.engine.SqlJetEngine.runEngineTransaction(SqlJetEngine.java:529)
Comment 1 schkovich 2012-12-16 14:17:55 UTC
Created attachment 129422 [details]
stacktrace
Comment 2 Ondrej Vrabec 2012-12-17 10:00:58 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 220377 ***