This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 209260 - StackOverflowError at FileObjectKeeper.init
Summary: StackOverflowError at FileObjectKeeper.init
Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: platform
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Filesystems (show other bugs)
Version: 7.1
Hardware: All All
: P3 normal (vote)
Assignee: Jaroslav Tulach
URL:
Keywords:
: 208361 210659 210660 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2012-03-07 09:26 UTC by hojothum
Modified: 2012-05-21 11:22 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter: 185609


Attachments
stacktrace (102.84 KB, text/plain)
2012-03-07 09:26 UTC, hojothum
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description hojothum 2012-03-07 09:26:45 UTC
This bug was originally marked as duplicate of bug 133078, that is already resolved. This bug is still valid, so this seems to be another bug, but it might be related.

Build: NetBeans IDE 7.1.1 (Build 201203012225)
VM: Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM, 20.4-b02-402, Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment, 1.6.0_29-b11-402-11D50b
OS: Mac OS X

User Comments:
hojothum: Moved a folder with a decent amount of files and subfolders into a parent directory using drag and drop in the Files view.




Stacktrace: 
java.lang.StackOverflowError
   at java.io.UnixFileSystem.list(UnixFileSystem.java:0)
   at java.io.File.list(File.java:973)
   at java.io.File.listFiles(File.java:1051)
   at org.netbeans.modules.masterfs.filebasedfs.children.ChildrenSupport$1IOJob.run(ChildrenSupport.java:224)
   at org.netbeans.modules.masterfs.filebasedfs.fileobjects.FolderObj.refreshImpl(FolderObj.java:455)
   at org.netbeans.modules.masterfs.filebasedfs.fileobjects.BaseFileObj.refresh(BaseFileObj.java:801)
Comment 1 hojothum 2012-03-07 09:26:47 UTC
Created attachment 116419 [details]
stacktrace
Comment 2 Jaroslav Tulach 2012-03-22 14:40:31 UTC
*** Bug 208361 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Marian Mirilovic 2012-04-05 14:46:51 UTC
*** Bug 210659 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Jaroslav Tulach 2012-04-10 11:49:19 UTC
*** Bug 210660 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Jaroslav Tulach 2012-05-21 11:22:49 UTC
Last report from Apr 3, 2012. Maybe we can hope the problem is gone?