This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 188419 - [69cat] javax.swing.undo.CannotUndoException at javax.swing.undo.AbstractUndoableEdit.undo
Summary: [69cat] javax.swing.undo.CannotUndoException at javax.swing.undo.AbstractUndo...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 183456
Alias: None
Product: editor
Classification: Unclassified
Component: -- Other -- (show other bugs)
Version: 6.x
Hardware: All All
: P3 normal (vote)
Assignee: issues@editor
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2010-07-06 19:44 UTC by jww2nc
Modified: 2010-07-09 10:26 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter: 171217

Attachments
stacktrace (2.47 KB, text/plain)
2010-07-06 19:44 UTC, jww2nc 		Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description jww2nc 2010-07-06 19:44:25 UTC 
This bug was originally marked as duplicate of bug 171275, that is already resolved. This bug is still valid, so this seems to be another bug, but it might be related.

Build: NetBeans IDE 6.9 (Build 201006101454)
VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM, 16.3-b01, Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment, 1.6.0_20-b02
OS: Windows 7

User Comments:
jww2nc: js script within php file




Stacktrace: 
javax.swing.undo.CannotUndoException
   at javax.swing.undo.AbstractUndoableEdit.undo(AbstractUndoableEdit.java:93)
   at javax.swing.undo.CompoundEdit.undo(CompoundEdit.java:42)
   at org.netbeans.editor.BaseDocument$AtomicCompoundEdit.undo(BaseDocument.java:2202)
   at org.netbeans.editor.BaseDocument.breakAtomicLock(BaseDocument.java:1864)
   at org.netbeans.editor.GuardedDocument.runAtomicAsUser(GuardedDocument.java:350)
   at org.netbeans.editor.BaseKit$InsertBreakAction.actionPerformed(BaseKit.java:1201)
Comment 1 jww2nc 2010-07-06 19:44:29 UTC 
Created attachment 100630 [details]
stacktrace
Comment 2 Vitezslav Stejskal 2010-07-09 10:26:49 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 183456 ***